Need to verify the iRule to replace HTTP Class
Hello Folks, Seek for your quick help. I am working on a upgrade activity for one of the customers from 11.2.1 to 11.5.1. Where they have one HTTP Class containing RegEx, which isn't migrating to the latest release. The HTTP Class looks as the following screenshot. The iRule I have prepared looks as following, to serve the same purpose as HTTP Class. Could someone please confirm if it looks correct or require any modification? when HTTP_REQUEST { if {[HTTP::uri] matches_regex {"(?i)/testuri.*"} and [HTTP::header "header_sosproject"] contains "SOS_project"} { pool pool_sos } } Cheers! DarshanDifference between HTTP Class URI format
Hello Folks, Just out of curiosity I want to confirm what is the difference between the following URI match in one of my HTTP Class Profile. regex:/[Hh]][Rr][Dd][Ii][Rr][Ee][Cc][Tt][Ss][Ee][Ll][Ff][Ss][Ee][Rr][Vv][Ii][Cc][Ee]_[Ii][Nn][Tt]/.* glob:/[Hh]][Rr][Dd][Ii][Rr][Ee][Cc][Tt][Ss][Ee][Ll][Ff][Ss][Ee][Rr][Vv][Ii][Cc][Ee]_[Ii][Nn][Tt]/.* Both of the URI is same, however one is defined with regex, and another one defined without regex. Will it be any difference in terms of traffic processing by LTM, or performance impact? Thank you, Darshan
