High Latency on performance L4 type VIP

Question

&nbsp;Server reported that they are facing high latency on performance L4 type VIP which causing the job patching takes lot of time to completeWe checked that VIP is fine and nothing changes were happened on it.&nbsp;Its performance L4 type vs, Other profiles called under this VIP are default TCP, FastL4 profile.NO other profiles were used under this VIP. And on TCP dump we did not observed any latency. &nbsp;Under VIP, four poolmembers are configured. &nbsp;They says, They face latency issue when they connect via VIP and done see latency whe they directly connect to backend poolmembers from source&nbsp;Below is trace from source server.. they say.. Latency is constancy increasing (3109ms)&nbsp;VIP : prod.abcd.com&nbsp;Traceroute from one of source server.traceroute to prod.abcd.com (10.10.10.34), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets&nbsp;1&nbsp;prod.abcd.com (10.10.10.34) (AS 65162)&nbsp;1.796 ms&nbsp;1.483 ms&nbsp;1.005 ms&nbsp;2&nbsp;* * 10.10.10.1 (10.10.10.1) (AS 65162)&nbsp;1001.47 ms !H&nbsp;3&nbsp;* * *&nbsp;4&nbsp;* * 10.10.10.1 (10.10.10.1) (AS 65162)&nbsp;1001.06 ms !H&nbsp;5&nbsp;* 10.10.10.1 (10.10.10.1) (AS 65162)&nbsp;997.337 ms !H *&nbsp;6&nbsp;10.10.10.1 (10.10.10.1) (AS 65162)&nbsp;4564.77 ms !H&nbsp;3109.66 ms !H&nbsp;*&nbsp;Can anyone help me to from LB perspective, where else can be issue?

jaikumar_f5 · Answer

Obviously 3 sec is considered high latency.  Where is your LTM &amp; servers are located, Same DC, different DC's ?Always try to choose the LTM from the same DC as of server.

girishb · Answer

yes.. Source servers and both LTM &amp; backend servers are in same DC..&nbsp;Do you think lany routing ooping causing this ?

jaikumar_f5 · Answer

Can you run a tracepath from the ltm to the server for our reference.Along with the tracepath from Client to LTM &amp; Client to backend server

girishb · Answer

&nbsp;admin@(F5-ACTIVE)(cfg-sync Changes Pending)(Active)(/Common)(tmos)# tracepath 10.10.20.1&nbsp;1:&nbsp;no reply&nbsp;2:&nbsp;no reply&nbsp;3:&nbsp;no reply&nbsp;4:&nbsp;no reply&nbsp;5:&nbsp;no reply&nbsp;6:&nbsp;no reply&nbsp;7:&nbsp;no reply&nbsp;8:&nbsp;no reply&nbsp;9:&nbsp;no reply10:&nbsp;no reply11:&nbsp;no reply12:&nbsp;no reply13:&nbsp;no reply14:&nbsp;no reply15:&nbsp;no reply16:&nbsp;no reply17:&nbsp;no reply18:&nbsp;no reply19:&nbsp;no reply20:&nbsp;no reply21:&nbsp;no reply22:&nbsp;no reply23:&nbsp;no reply24:&nbsp;no reply25:&nbsp;no reply26:&nbsp;no reply27:&nbsp;no reply28:&nbsp;no reply29:&nbsp;no reply30:&nbsp;no reply31:&nbsp;no reply&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Too many hops: pmtu 65535&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Resume: pmtu 65535&nbsp;

Forum Discussion

High Latency on performance L4 type VIP

4 Replies

Recent Discussions

health monitor without hostname

F5OS missing interfaces in tenant

F5 f5-bigip-runtime-init for on-prem

HOW TO HIRE A HACKER TO RECOVERY LOST OR STOLEN BITCOIN. CONNECT WITH FASTFUND RECOVERY SERVICRS.

F5 WAF risk assessment

Related Content

Deploy High-Availability and Latency-sensitive workloads with F5 Distributed Cloud

High Performance Intrusion Prevention

High Performance HMAC Cookie Signing

Getting Started with BIG-IP Next: Configuring Instance High Availability

high performance rate limiting